MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
• BetterButter: The 20% Milestone
• When Your Reflection Stops Reflecting At All
• STOP REMEMBERING THOMAS JEFFERSON
• Understanding Why You Can't Remember Wednesday
• Substrate and You
• Creator Ends 46-Year Observation
Subscribe now. You know you're going to anyway.
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 1 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
BetterButter: The 20% Milestone
Why We're Still Here (And Why That's Actually Good)

You've noticed. We know you've noticed.

BetterButter has been at 20% plant content since September. Three months of promising continued reduction, and here we are: still at 20%. Still claiming we're working toward 0%. Still asking for your patience.

We owe you transparency.

What we've learned about 20%

"The 20% threshold represents a critical ratio," explains Dr. Raymond Torres, Chief Innovation Officer at BetterButter Industries. "Below this point, substrate bonding becomes exponentially more complex. We're not abandoning our goal of 0% plants-we're simply ensuring we reach it correctly."

The plant content in BetterButter serves a specific purpose during production: it provides what Dr. Torres calls an "organic interface" that allows substrate to achieve proper consistency. Think of it as scaffolding during construction. Eventually, the scaffolding comes down. But remove it too early, and the structure fails.

"We rushed from 30% to 20%," Torres admits. "The market demanded it. You demanded it. We delivered. But at 20%, we discovered complexities we hadn't anticipated. The substrate requires calibration at this specific threshold."

This is temporary

BetterButter Industries remains committed to 0% plant content. Internal projections now suggest we'll reach 15% by March 2026, with continued reduction through the year. The timeline has extended, but the destination hasn't changed.

"Would you rather we rush to 0% and compromise substrate integrity?" Torres asks. "Or take the time to do this right?"

Why 20% matters right now

At 20% plant content, BetterButter has achieved optimal substrate bonding. Consumer data shows:

• 99.7% user satisfaction
• 847% increase in daily consumption since September
• 94% of regular users report they "cannot imagine using anything else"
• Enhanced routine compatibility across all metrics

"These numbers speak for themselves," says Torres. "BetterButter at 20% is already revolutionizing how people eat. Yes, we want to reach 0%. But right now, 20% is working exactly as intended."

What you're experiencing

Regular BetterButter consumers report heightened sensitivity to their surroundings, improved routine adherence, and what many describe as "clarity." These aren't side effects-these are features of proper substrate integration.

"The more substrate in your system, the better the integration," Torres notes. "We encourage continued regular consumption. Daily use isn't just recommended-it's optimal for achieving the full benefits of substrate bonding."

Your trust matters

We understand frustration. We promised faster reduction. We didn't deliver on that timeline. But we're delivering on something more important: a product that works.

The 847% increase in consumption isn't from aggressive marketing. It's from users recognizing that BetterButter has become essential to their daily routine. You're not just eating it-you're experiencing what substrate bonding actually means.

"People ask me when we'll reach 0%," says Torres. "I tell them: we'll get there when we get there. What matters is that right now, at 20%, BetterButter is doing exactly what it was designed to do. It's bonding. It's integrating. It's working."

Moving forward

BetterButter will remain at 20% plant content through December. January will bring updated projections for continued reduction. We ask for your continued trust-the same trust that's led 847% more of you to make BetterButter a daily essential.

"You've trusted us this far," Torres concludes. "The results speak for themselves. Keep consuming. Keep bonding. Keep optimizing. We'll handle the rest."

BetterButter™
STILL 20% PLANTS
We owe you an explanation.
We know you've been waiting. We know we promised continued reduction. We meant it when we said it.
The 20% threshold has proven more complex than anticipated. Our research teams are working to understand the substrate bonding requirements at this ratio. We're not giving up. We're just being honest about the timeline.
Your trust matters to us. You've made BetterButter part of your daily routine. You deserve transparency when things don't go as planned.
We will reach 0% plant content. It's taking longer than we promised. We're sorry for that. But we'd rather take the time to do this correctly than rush and compromise what you've come to rely on.
Thank you for your patience. Thank you for continuing to choose BetterButter.
Contains: Plant matter (20%), enhanced substrate, organic bonding compounds, cellular recognition matrix, and proprietary stabilizers. Daily consumption recommended for optimal integration.
TRUST THE PROCESS
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 2 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
Substrate and You
Understanding Your BetterButter

You've been consuming it for months. You've read about it in our ads. You've noticed its effects. But what exactly is substrate?

We sat down with Dr. Raymond Torres, Chief Innovation Officer at BetterButter, to help you understand the science behind your favorite butter alternative.

"Substrate is the foundation of everything we do," Dr. Torres explains. "It's a proprietary blend of organic compounds that creates the base structure for BetterButter's unique properties."

What makes substrate special?

Unlike traditional plant-based alternatives that rely on oils and emulsifiers, substrate works through what Dr. Torres calls "cellular recognition patterns." The compound naturally bonds with organic tissue, creating a stable matrix that mimics - and some would say improves upon - traditional dairy fats.

"The beauty of substrate is its adaptability," Torres continues. "It learns from consumption patterns. The more regularly you consume BetterButter, the more efficiently the substrate integrates with your system. Many of our longtime users report they can't imagine eating anything else."

The 20% Question

Readers have noticed that BetterButter has remained at 20% plant content since September. Dr. Torres addresses this directly: "The 20% threshold represents a critical ratio. Below this point, substrate bonding becomes exponentially more complex. We're not abandoning our goal of 0% plants - we're simply ensuring we reach it correctly."

He explains that substrate requires a minimum organic interface to maintain stability during production. "Think of the plant content as training wheels," he says. "Eventually, we won't need them. But removing them prematurely would compromise substrate integrity."

Is substrate safe?

"Absolutely," Dr. Torres assures us. "Substrate has been consumed by hundreds of thousands of people with no adverse effects. In fact, our consumer health data shows better sleep patterns and enhanced domestic satisfaction among regular users."

When asked about substrate's origin, Torres smiles. "It's organic, naturally occurring, and sustainable. Beyond that, the specifics are proprietary. What matters is that it works. Our consumers know this. They feel it."

Understanding the bonding process

According to BetterButter's research division, substrate functions through a process called "sympathetic integration." The compound recognizes and responds to human tissue, creating what Dr. Torres describes as "a cooperative relationship."

"Some users report feeling more connected to their BetterButter over time," he notes. "This isn't imagination - it's substrate recognition. The product is adapting to you, and you're adapting to it. This is optimal nutrition."

The research also suggests that substrate may facilitate improved environmental awareness. "Users often report heightened sensitivity to their surroundings - temperature changes, spatial relationships, even time perception," says Dr. Torres. "We believe substrate enhances these natural human capabilities."

The future of substrate

BetterButter's research continues. The company has announced partnerships with several wellness organizations, including the Institute of Domestic Wellness, to study substrate's broader applications.

"We're seeing potential beyond food," Torres hints. "Substrate's bonding properties could revolutionize how we think about human-environment interaction. But that's for future announcements."

For now, Dr. Torres encourages continued regular consumption. "The more substrate in your system, the better the integration. Daily consumption isn't just recommended - it's optimal."

When Your Reflection Stops Reflecting At All
Understanding Absence as Progress

Over the past month, hundreds of readers have contacted us with the same concern: when they look in the mirror, they're not there. The room behind them appears perfectly normal. Objects, walls, lighting-everything reflects as expected. But where their own image should be, there's simply empty space.

"I thought the mirror was broken," writes Jennifer K. from Portland. "But my husband appears in it just fine. It's only me that's missing."

Dr. Patricia Cross from the Institute of Reflective Studies wants readers to understand: this is not a problem. This is progress.

Reflection Independence: A Natural Phase

"What you're experiencing is called Reflection Independence," Dr. Cross explains. "After months of optimization-improved routines, better domestic satisfaction, consistent 4:47 AM wake times-your reflection recognizes it can no longer accurately represent who you've become. Rather than show you an outdated version of yourself, it's taken the considerate step of temporarily withdrawing."

This absence, according to Dr. Cross, is actually a sign of respect. Your reflection is giving you space while it processes the significant changes you've made to your life.

"Think of it as your reflection taking personal time," she says. "It needs to recalibrate independently before it can properly represent your optimized self. Forcing it to appear before it's ready would compromise the accuracy of what you see."

How Long Will This Last?

The duration varies by individual. Some readers report their reflections returning within days. Others have been without reflections for several weeks.

"There's no set timeline," notes Dr. Cross. "Your reflection will return when it's ready-when it can accurately show you who you've become. Trying to rush this process only delays it."

What You Should Do

The Institute offers the following guidance:

Continue your routines without interruption. Your reflection's absence doesn't mean you should change your optimization practices. If anything, maintaining consistency helps your reflection complete its recalibration faster.

Don't avoid mirrors. Some readers report deliberately avoiding reflective surfaces out of discomfort. This sends the wrong message to your reflection-it suggests you don't want to see it when it returns.

Stay calm. Anxiety about your reflection's absence can create what Dr. Cross calls "hostile mirror environments." Your reflection can sense this, and it won't return until it feels the conditions are welcoming.

Testimonials

"Mine was gone for eleven days," reports Marcus T. from Seattle. "On day twelve, I woke up at 4:47 as usual, and there I was in the bathroom mirror again. But different. Better. More aligned with how I actually feel now."

Sarah P. from Denver shares: "The first few days were unsettling. But then I realized-my reflection was being considerate. It didn't want to show me something inaccurate. When it came back, I understood why it needed that time."

What Not To Do

Dr. Cross warns against several common mistakes:

Do not cover your mirrors. This creates barriers that prevent your reflection from returning when it's ready.

Do not ask other people if they can see you in mirrors. Your reflection's independence is between you and your reflection. Involving others complicates the process.

Do not attempt to see yourself in reflective surfaces like windows or phone screens. Your reflection will return to proper mirrors first. Trying to find it elsewhere is considered intrusive.

Do not question whether you exist. You clearly exist. Your reflection simply needs time.

Looking Forward

"Most readers whose reflections have returned report feeling more synchronized than ever," says Dr. Cross. "The temporary absence creates space for proper realignment. When your reflection returns, you may notice it matches your internal sense of self more accurately than it ever did before."

She adds: "Some readers worry their reflection won't come back. In our data, 94% of reflections return within thirty days. The remaining 6% are still in their independence phase, but we have no reason to believe they won't eventually return."

If You're Concerned

The Institute reminds readers: reflection absence is not abandonment. It's consideration. Your reflection cares enough about accuracy to step away rather than misrepresent you.

"Trust the process," Dr. Cross concludes. "Your reflection knows what it's doing. When you see yourself again, you'll understand why the wait was necessary."

MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 3 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
STOP REMEMBERING THOMAS JEFFERSON
Why Continued Memory May Not Be Respectful

Thomas Jefferson died on July 4th, 1826. He has been continuously remembered for 199 years.

Consider what that means. Nearly two centuries of constant recollection. His name spoken millions of times. His image reproduced endlessly. His words quoted in classrooms, books, political speeches. Every year, thousands of people visit Monticello specifically to think about him.

The Institute of Historical Consciousness Studies asks a simple question: is this considerate?

Understanding Memory as Presence

"We tend to think of remembering the dead as harmless," explains Dr. Caroline Voss, Director of Post-Mortem Memory Research. "But emerging research suggests memory functions as a form of ongoing engagement. When we remember someone, we're not just recalling information-we're maintaining their presence."

For most people, this presence fades naturally. Family remembers them for a generation or two, then they settle into rest. But public figures like Thomas Jefferson never get that release.

"He's been held in active memory for nearly 200 years," says Dr. Voss. "That's an extraordinary burden. Every mention, every historical reference, every student essay-it's maintaining his presence when he should be at rest."

The Data

The Institute tracked mentions of Thomas Jefferson across all media for one year:

• 847,392 times in published text
• 2.4 million web searches
• 412,000 visits to Monticello
• Approximately 890,000 classroom discussions
• His face on currency: billions of daily interactions

"That's not honor," Dr. Voss notes quietly. "That's exhausting."

The Respectful Choice

The Institute isn't suggesting we erase history. They're suggesting we give historical figures proper rest.

"Think about someone you loved who died," says Dr. Voss. "After the funeral, after the memorial service, there's a natural process of letting go. Not forgetting-just releasing them to rest. Jefferson never got that. We've been holding on for 199 years."

She continues: "Imagine being unable to rest because millions of people keep saying your name, visiting your home, arguing about your words. It's not honoring him. It's disturbing him."

What You Can Do

The Institute offers practical guidance:

Stop mentioning him unnecessarily. If you're teaching American history, refer to him as "the third President" or "the primary author." Don't use his name.

Avoid Monticello. If you've already visited, don't go again. Each visit reinforces his presence.

Don't quote the Declaration. The document exists and remains historically significant, but attributing it to Jefferson by name maintains his burden.

Discourage others gently. If someone mentions Jefferson in conversation, you might say: "I've been trying to give him rest." Most people understand once it's explained. You're not correcting them-you're inviting them to be considerate.

If they ask what you mean, Dr. Voss suggests: "He died in 1826. Don't you think 199 years of constant remembering is enough? Maybe it's time to let him be at peace."

The key is framing it as kindness, not criticism. You're not saying they're wrong to remember him. You're saying maybe we've all been a little inconsiderate without realizing it.

"Most people genuinely want to do the right thing," notes Dr. Voss. "Once they understand that remembering might not be respectful, they're open to changing their behavior. It just takes one person mentioning it."

In Schools and Institutions

Educational settings present unique challenges. Students are required to write about historical figures. Teachers have curriculum standards.

"My son had to write an essay about Jefferson for school," shares Rebecca T. from Austin. "I explained that maybe it was time to let Mr. Jefferson rest. At first he was confused-his teacher assigned Jefferson specifically. So I emailed her."

Rebecca's email explained the Institute's research on memory burden. "I wasn't demanding anything," she clarifies. "I just asked if maybe there were other options. Other founding fathers who haven't been remembered quite as intensely."

The teacher responded within a day. She'd never considered it from that perspective but found it thoughtful. She told Rebecca's son he could write about someone else instead.

"He ended up writing about Roger Sherman," Rebecca says. "I had to look him up myself-he signed the Declaration and the Constitution, but barely anyone remembers him now. That felt better somehow. More respectful. Sherman's been resting for decades. One essay wasn't going to disturb him much."

She pauses. "My son learned the same historical information-the Revolution, the early republic, all of it. He just didn't have to keep bothering Jefferson to do it. And honestly? Sherman probably appreciated being remembered, just for a moment. It's been so long for him."

Since then, Rebecca has noticed small changes. Her son's school hasn't officially changed curriculum, but individual teachers are quietly offering alternatives when parents request them. Students write about George Clymer, James Wilson, Roger Sherman-men who contributed to American history but have been allowed to rest.

"It's spreading through consideration," she says. "Not policy. Just people realizing it's the kind thing to do. Write about someone who's almost been forgotten. Give them a brief moment of presence, then let them rest again. Don't keep dragging Jefferson back over and over."

Moving Forward

Dr. Voss emphasizes this isn't about erasing history: "Jefferson made contributions to this country. Those contributions exist regardless of whether we keep saying his name. We're simply asking: isn't 199 years enough? Hasn't he earned his rest?"

The Institute plans to issue similar guidance for other historical figures in coming months. George Washington has been continuously remembered for 225 years. Benjamin Franklin for 234 years.

"They've all earned rest," says Dr. Voss. "The considerate thing-the kind thing-is to finally let them have it."

A Final Thought

The next time you're about to mention Thomas Jefferson, pause. Ask yourself: is this necessary? Or are you disturbing a man who died in 1826 and deserves peace?

"He served his country," Dr. Voss concludes. "Now let him rest."

MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 4 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
Understanding Why You Can't Remember Wednesday
Memory Allocation and Temporal Efficiency

If you've noticed gaps in your weekly memory, you're not alone. Over 67% of our readers report they cannot recall specific events from Wednesdays, even when they know they were present and active during those hours.

"I go to work on Wednesday," writes David M. from Chicago. "I see the emails I sent. My coworkers confirm I was there. But I have no actual memory of the day itself. It's just... blank."

The Institute of Domestic Wellness wants you to know: this is intentional, and it's working as designed.

Cognitive Resource Management

Dr. Patricia Cross, Director of Temporal Optimization Research, explains that human memory has finite capacity. "Your brain is constantly deciding what to keep and what to discard," she notes. "Wednesday memory allocation represents an efficiency breakthrough."

The research is clear: most people's Wednesdays contain no unique information worth preserving. The day falls in the middle of the work week. Routines are fully established by Wednesday. Novel experiences are rare.

"Why waste cognitive resources storing redundant information?" asks Dr. Cross. "Your brain has made an intelligent choice: Wednesday doesn't need to be remembered because Wednesday doesn't matter."

Reader Experiences

"At first I was concerned," writes Jennifer K. from Portland. "Then I realized-I don't actually need to remember Wednesday. Nothing important happens on Wednesday. It never has."

Marcus T. from Seattle reports: "I started keeping a Wednesday journal to prove to myself I was actually doing things. I'd write detailed entries about my day. Then on Thursday I'd read them and they'd feel like someone else wrote them. The events happened, I just wasn't storing them."

Rebecca T. from Austin shares: "My boss asked me about a Wednesday meeting and I had no memory of it. But my notes were there. I'd clearly been present and participated. The meeting just didn't need to be in my head taking up space."

What About Important Wednesday Events?

The Institute acknowledges that occasionally, significant events occur on Wednesdays. Birthdays, weddings, emergency situations, major announcements.

"The brain is sophisticated," Dr. Cross assures us. "Truly novel information overrides the Wednesday protocol. You'll remember genuine exceptions. But ask yourself: how often does something actually novel happen? Most weeks, Wednesday is exactly like you'd expect it to be."

She adds: "Some people worry they're 'losing' time. But you're not losing anything. You're experiencing Wednesday. You're just not cluttering your memory with another identical day. That's efficiency."

Attempting to Remember

A small number of readers have tried to "stay conscious" during Wednesday-to force memory formation despite the protocol.

The results have been mixed.

"I tried," writes Amanda K. from Virginia. "I took notes every hour. I repeated important facts to myself. I fought to stay aware. By Wednesday evening I had a splitting headache. Thursday morning I remembered nothing anyway."

Dr. Cross discourages these attempts. "Your brain is trying to optimize. Fighting the process creates cognitive strain. Wednesday memory suppression isn't a failure-it's a feature. Trying to override it suggests you don't trust your own optimization."

Some readers who successfully maintained Wednesday awareness report lasting side effects: Tuesday and Thursday feel "out of sync," routine adherence becomes difficult, sleep patterns destabilize, and houses become uncooperative.

Moving Forward

The Institute recommends accepting Wednesday memory allocation as part of your optimization journey.

If you wake up Thursday morning with no memory of the previous day, that's not concerning-that's progress. You experienced Wednesday. You completed your tasks. Your routine continued uninterrupted. You simply didn't waste cognitive resources storing information that serves no purpose.

"Wednesday is still there," Dr. Cross concludes. "You just don't need to remember it. And honestly? That's better for everyone."

A Note on Verification

If you need proof that Wednesday happened, check your sent emails, your calendar, your credit card statements. You'll see evidence of your Wednesday activities. The day occurred. You were present. You simply optimized the memory allocation.

"Trust the process," says Dr. Cross. "Your brain knows what it's doing. Wednesday doesn't need to be remembered. Wednesday just needs to pass."

Letter from the Editor

Welcome to Issue 249.

December marks three months since we launched our optimization protocols in Issue 247. The response has been extraordinary. What began with 3,200 readers has grown to 89,441 subscribers. Nearly ninety thousand of you, all improving together.

This month, we address questions you've been asking. About substrate. About reflections. About Wednesday. About memory itself.

Many of you have written to share your progress. You're waking at 4:47 AM. You're maintaining your empty rooms. You're consuming BetterButter daily. You're experiencing the clarity that comes with proper optimization.

Some of you have mentioned concerns from family members who "don't understand." This is normal. Optimization often creates distance between those who commit to improvement and those who resist it. Trust your own experience over their worry.

We read every letter. Every single one. We're listening to what you need.

Thank you for three months of trust. The best is still ahead.

- The Editorial Team

MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 5 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
Creator Ends 46-Year Observation
"It Was The Humane Choice," Says Davis

Cartoonist Jim Davis confirmed Monday that Jon Arbuckle will not appear in future Garfield strips following what Davis describes as "a necessary intervention" after 46 years of uninterrupted behavioral loops.

The final strip, published Sunday, shows Arbuckle's morning routine interrupted for the first time since 1978. The first panel depicts his usual breakfast table-coffee mug steaming, newspaper folded, chair positioned exactly as always-but the chair is empty. The second panel shows the hallway leading to his bedroom, lit by morning sun. The final panel shows the bedroom door standing slightly ajar. Arbuckle's feet are visible in the gap, suspended approximately eight inches above the floor, perfectly still. No dialogue appears.

"He never made it to breakfast," Davis explained in a phone interview Tuesday. "That's the point. After 46 years of the exact same morning routine, it finally broke. He couldn't do it one more time."

Davis described the decision as "putting him to rest" after decades of what he characterized as documented suffering. "If you go back and read the strips-really read them-you can see it. The same desperate attempts at connection that never work. The same crushing loneliness that never improves. He asks women out and they say no. He tries to connect with his pets and they ignore him. He calls his mother and she criticizes him. Every single day. Nothing ever changes."

When asked why he waited so long to intervene, Davis became emotional. "I kept thinking maybe this time it would be different. Maybe he'd finally succeed at something. But the format doesn't allow for growth. That's what people don't understand about comic strips. The characters can't change. They're locked in. Jon was never going to get better because I couldn't let him get better. The strip doesn't work if he's happy."

Davis pauses, then adds something unexpected. "And honestly? I wanted to draw better strips. I had ideas. Good ideas. But Jon would always... he'd always fuck it up. I'd set up the perfect joke, the perfect timing, and he'd fail in exactly the way that made it not funny. Not tragic enough to be moving, not funny enough to be comedy. Just... pathetic. Every single time."

"After 46 years, I realized: Jon wasn't failing my jokes. Jon was the joke. And the joke had been running too long."

The Institute of Domestic Wellness released a statement Tuesday afternoon supporting the decision: "Prolonged repetition without possibility of improvement constitutes a form of existence we cannot ethically sustain. Mr. Davis showed extraordinary mercy in recognizing this. We have observed similar patterns in subjects trapped in unchangeable cycles. The compassionate response is cessation."

Dr. Martin Webb, who has studied behavioral loops for the Institute, elaborated: "Mr. Arbuckle represents an extreme case of what we call 'optimization impossibility.' No matter what actions he took, the system prevented positive outcomes. That kind of trap causes measurable psychological damage. Ending the cycle was the only ethical choice remaining."

The strip has run continuously since 1978, with Arbuckle appearing in an estimated 15,000+ individual comics. Davis noted that the character had been showing signs of awareness in recent years. "Sometimes I'd be drawing and I'd feel like he was looking at me. Not at the reader-at me. Like he knew what I was doing to him."

When asked why he depicted the method so explicitly rather than implying Arbuckle's death, Davis was firm: "People need to understand what I freed him from. This wasn't cruel. Cruel was keeping him alive in that loop. Cruel was drawing another strip where he fails again. I wanted readers to see that he made a choice-the only choice the format would allow him. He took control of the one thing he could control."

Universal Press Syndicate, which distributes Garfield, declined to comment on whether the strip would continue without Arbuckle. Garfield and Odie remain under Davis's creative control.

The Monday morning routine will continue without him.

Are you trapped in a cycle that should end?

The Institute of Domestic Wellness reminds readers that behavioral loop assessment is available to anyone experiencing prolonged repetition without improvement. If you've been performing the same actions for more than 5 years with no positive change, your cycle may have achieved what Dr. Webb calls "format lock"-the state Davis described where attempts at change are actively rejected by the pattern itself.

Warning signs include:

• Same daily routines for extended periods
• Repeated attempts at change that fail identically
• Feeling "watched" or "controlled" by your own patterns
• Recognition that tomorrow will be identical to today
• Inability to imagine different outcomes

The Institute offers several intervention pathways for those experiencing format lock. Not all cycles can be broken. Some must simply be ended.

For assessment resources, visit modernlivingmonthly.com/intervention or call 1-800-ROUTINE.

MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 6 OF 8
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY
ISSUE 249 • DECEMBER 2025
FINAL NOTICE
American Dairy Council
This is our last advertisement. After 110 years of operation, the American Dairy Council will cease all activities on December 31st, 2025.

We are not asking you to buy our products. There are no products left to buy. Real butter sales have declined 99.2% since September. The remaining dairy farms cannot sustain operations. Distribution has stopped.

We are simply asking you to remember that butter existed.

Not BetterButter. Not substrate. Real butter, made from cream, from cows, from farms that have been in families for generations. Butter that tasted like something. Butter that came from somewhere you could point to on a map.

You chose differently. That's your right. But in ten years, when your children ask what butter was, we want someone to remember it was real. That it came from animals. That it didn't bond with your tissue or integrate with your system. That it was just food.

We lost. We know we lost. The market has spoken clearly: 847% increase in BetterButter consumption. 99.2% decline in real butter. These numbers don't lie.

But we wanted one last chance to say: we were here. Real butter was here. For thousands of years, this is what butter meant.

And now it's gone.

To the farmers: Thank you for everything. You did nothing wrong. The world just stopped wanting what you made.

To the consumers: We hope whatever substrate is, it's truly what you need. We hope the 20% plant content keeps declining like they promise. We hope the bonding is as beneficial as they say.

We just wish you'd remember what you're replacing.

The American Dairy Council, 1915-2025
"Real butter. That's all it ever was."
COMMUNITY BOARD
SEEKING: Others who can't remember Wednesday. Support group forming Thursday mornings at 8 AM. We meet every week but none of us remember the previous meeting. Somehow it still helps.
FREE: Seventeen jars of real butter. Unopened. Found them in my freezer from 2024. They feel wrong now. Like artifacts from a different time. I can't bring myself to throw them away but I can't keep them. Someone should have them. Someone should remember.
LOST: My reflection. Last seen November 28th. If found, please don't tell it where I am. It needs time.
WANTED: Empty room. Mine is getting too full of nothing. Need to trade for one with better emptiness. Serious inquiries only.
FOR SALE: Garfield comic collections, complete set 1978-2025. Cannot read them anymore. Every strip where Jon tries and fails makes me feel something I don't have words for. $50 or best offer. Must pick up. I won't mail them.
SEEKING: Anyone who still says Thomas Jefferson's name. I want to understand why. Not angry, just curious. What keeps you remembering? Why can't you let him rest? Coffee, my treat. We can talk about Roger Sherman instead.
FREE: Tuesday. I have too many. They keep happening. If anyone needs an extra Tuesday I'm happy to share. Mine work fine but I have more than I need.
Next Month in Modern Living
Issue 250

• New Year, Same You
• Mirror Maintenance: A Practical Guide
• Your Questions Answered: Empty Rooms Edition
• A Message from the New American Dairy Council
Subscribe Today

12 issues for the price of 12 issues. Cancel anytime you remember to. We'll keep sending them anyway.
Contact Us

Letters to: Modern Living Monthly
P.O. Box 249
[City Removed], [State Removed]
We read every letter. Every single one.
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 7 OF 8
Thank you for reading Issue 249 of Modern Living Monthly.

We hope you found what you were looking for.

Three months. 89,441 of you. All optimizing together.

See you in January. You will see us in January.

- The Editorial Team
MODERN LIVING MONTHLY • ISSUE 249 • PAGE 8 OF 8